On Monday, we looked at what makes a property hot in Boston, so we’re closing the week with a look at a market on the other coast: Los Angeles. The big question: will we see the same trends coast to coast?
We found there really are (hot) pockets of sunshine in the Los Angeles housing market, and this is not according to my trusty Magic 8-ball. We analyzed 2,364 real estate records for single-family listings in Los Angeles County, Calif. that entered the market between Oct. 1, 2007 and March 31, 2008, and sold.
We looked at the Los Angeles real estate market next because, well, you asked.
Here’s a rundown of the neighborhoods with the most listings that sold within seven days on the market; the numbers in parentheses calculate the hot properties as a percentage of the total houses that sold in those areas:
- Beverly Center, Miracle Mile: 12 (26%)
- Brentwood: 12 (27%)
- Los Angeles, Southwest: 10 (12%)
- Sunset Strip, Hollywood Hills West: 10 (11%)
- Westchester: 9 (17%)
For the areas where there were a significant number of hot properties, we compared the listings that sold in seven days or less with everything else that sold in those areas. Our goal was to develop a clear portrait of the hot property, so our buyers would know when they really had to hop to it. And here’s what we found:
- Beds and baths were the same for both types: there was no pattern in terms of bedrooms and bathrooms. Hot and “not” (not properties took more than eight days to sell) properties both had three bedrooms and two bathrooms. The coasts agree!
- Hot properties are bigger, slightly: The median square footage for hot properties was only slightly larger (.2%) than not properties, but the median lot size was 3% larger. Clearly, the LA sprawl doesn’t mean buyers get more space. Boston homebuyers got 13% larger lots with pretty similar sized homes – 1,669 square feet in Boston vs. 1,735 square feet in LA.
- Hot properties are newer: the median year built (1948) for hot properties was four years later than for the nots. Bostonians bought slightly older homes, but maybe that’s because most east coast homes are older?
Hot properties are expensive: it turns out that hot properties weren’t exactly priced to move. In fact, the median list price of hot properties ($1.1 million) was 16% higher. And the high price isn’t just because the houses are bigger: the median dollars per square foot was nearly 16% higher for hot properties ($633) as compared to the nots ($548). The median list price of Boston’s hot properties was $459,000 … you can get two for the price of one in Boston.
There wasn’t a huge difference in the days on market for the hot areas (43) and the entire Los Angeles market (45), but, on average, the hot properties sold in almost five days (Boston hot properties sold in about 4.5 days).
The bottom line is that hot properties are slightly bigger, newer and more expensive. There are distinct areas and house types where properties still sell fast, which continues to support our reason for doing this study in the first place — the real estate market isn’t really clinically depressed; it’s more of a split personality, with the good stuff selling fast, and the rest languishing.
Did you just buy a home in one of these neighborhoods? What was your experience?
Bonus link: The Wall Street Journal reports on the heartwarming side of the housing bust. [Warning: shameless Redfin plug] Read about a couple who escaped their 100-mile, LA-freeway commute.
View original post here:
Los Angeles Real Estate: Hot or Not?
Related Posts
- Boston Real Estate: Not Clinically Depressed, Just a Split Personality
Redfin’s Chris Glew — Redfin Advantage essayist, Boston hockey fan and student of ancient Mexican turds — stopped another fur-flying meeting in its tracks last week with an arresting observation. He said that even in this slow real estate market, he could tell just by looking when a new listing was going to sell in a couple of days. “I see it all the time,” he said, to a now-quiet room.
Whereupon further fur flew. Someone said that the only common characteristic would be a fire-sale price. Others talked about school districts, sex offenders, safe neighborhoods. And then someone quoted the founder of modern surgery, a corpse-stealing pragmatist who challenged the French mania for grand medical theories: “why think when you can experiment?”
Why indeed!
So the Real Estate Scientist leapt into his white lab coat and began sorting through 9,212 real estate records: single-family listings in Suffolk County, Massachusetts that were sold between October 1, 2007 and March 31, 2008.
Why the Boston real estate market? Because our ex-hippie, oils-painting, die-for-the-customer, hired-all-his-cousins market manager — Alex Coon — laid it on the line, betting that such listings exist, even in the dead of the miserable Boston winter, and that most of them would be in Newton. He was right!
Here’s a rundown of the towns with the most listings that sold within seven days on the market; the numbers in parentheses calculate the hot properties as a percentage of the total houses that sold in those areas:
- Arlington: 18 (23%)
- Boston: 21 (7%)
- Brockton: 16 (8%)
- Haverhill: 11 (12%)
- Needham: 14 (20%)
- Newton: 27 (16%)
- Wellesley: 12 (14%)
But it’s not just the location of the listings. Even in these markets, the average days on market was 85 days. The average for the entire Boston area was 105. This suggests that at least one reason hot properties were hot was the property itself.
So for the areas where there were a significant number of hot properties, we compared the listings that sold in less than seven days with everything else in those areas. Our goal was to develop a clear portrait of the hot property, so our buyers would know when they really had to hop to it. And here’s what we found:
- Beds and baths were the same for both types: there was no pattern in terms of bedrooms and bathrooms. Hot properties and pariguayos (party-watchers, aka slow-to-sell properties) both had 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms.
- Hot properties are bigger: The median square footage for hot properties was 7% larger than the pariguayos. The median lot size was more than 13% larger. Maybe that seems obvious to you — bigger is often better — but when we began the analysis, we had imagined hot properties as cute little cottages.
- Hot properties are older: the median year built (1949) for hot properties was 29% earlier than for the pariguayos.
- Hot properties are expensive: it turns out that hot properties weren’t exactly priced to move. In fact, the median list price of hot properties ($459,000) was 78% higher than the pariguayos. And the high price isn’t just because the houses are bigger: the median dollars per square foot was nearly 40% higher for hot properties ($275) as compared to pariguayos.
The bottom line is that hot properties are bigger, older, and more expensive. That there are distinct areas and house types where properties still sell fast supports Chris’s notion that the real estate market isn’t really clinically depressed; it’s more of a split personality, with the good stuff selling fast, and the rest languishing.
You could take that theory a step further, and say one reason the market is bad is because the inventory is low-quality, first because some of the least appealing properties are being forced onto the market by foreclosure and second because lots of unappealing inventory is hanging out from the year before when the rate of new listings was higher. We’ll have to test that theory out on another day.
Bostonians, what do you think of these findings? Real estate watchers, what other markets would you like to see us analyze? Many thanks to Redfin’s Rick West for doing all the hard analytical work.
Bonus Link, from the Original Friend of Redfin: Washington Redskins cheerleaders stun massive Indian cricket crowd.
Also, since cycling season is about to begin, we are releasing some new footage of the Redfin cycling team on a training ride:
Photo: Shutterscript on Flickr.
Originally posted here:
Boston Real Estate: Not Clinically Depressed, Just a Split Personality - Greenville SC Residential Real Estate Market Conditions Statistics, Properties, Listings and Homes for Sale – June 2009
Greenville SC Residential Real Estate Market Conditions Statistics, Properties, Listings and Homes for Sale – June 2009. Includes such cities as Simpsonville, Taylors, Mauldin, Fountain Inn, Travelers Rest, and more.
Greater Greenville real estate market saw an increase in sales again for the months of June. Inventory level has also gone down slightly compared to the month on May.
For the month of June, there were 673 (583 for May) residential listings sold, at an average sold price of $170,785. Total sold volume was $114,938,281, and the median sold price was $139,000. Average days on market for the month of June was 107 days.
Year to date, between January 1st – June 30th 2009, there were 3115 residential listings sold, at a total volume of $518,009,071. The average sold price was $166,295, and median sold price was $139,400. Average days on market was 102 days.
As of July 10th, 2009, there were 7062 (7175 for same time in June) residential listings Active in the Greater Greenville MLS. Average list price was $270,756, Total volume was $1,912,078,161, and the median list price was $190,000. The average days on market for these active listings was 149 days.
Please keep in mind that this report may not include all sales like For Sale By Owners, and new construction homes brokered by MLS member firms. Stats were gathered from Greater Greenville Association of Realtors.
Feel free to contact me at any time for an update on your neighborhood, or for your Greenville, Simpsonville, and Upstate real estate needs.
As your Simpsonville SC and Greater Greenville residential Realtor, I am committed to staying up to date with local information, education, and technology. My intention is to be an invaluable real estate resource. So, whether you are buying or selling real estate in Simpsonville SC, Greenville SC, Greer SC, Easley SC, Mauldin SC, Fountain Inn SC, Pickens, Powdersville, Taylors, or other Upstate SC areas, I have the tools, knowledge, experience, and resources necessary to make your experience an enjoyable and successful one. I can also help you avoid foreclosure, find Foreclosures and Short sale Properties, listings and Homes for Sale. Call me at 864-525-0201 so we can discuss how I can help make your next real estate transaction a success.
Victor Amadi is a Greenville SC Residential Real Estate Expert, who specializes in helping Home Buyers find the best possible home and get the best possible deal. He also specializes in utilizing some of the best marketing tools to help home sellers get their home sold fast and for top dollar.
Free WP Plugins - Coronado, San Diego, Real Estate Market Trends, Single-family Homes, Mid Year Analysis, 2006
The community of Coronado is located on the central coast of San Diego County. This 13.5 square mile peninsula is accessible via the famous Coronado Bay Bridge, by water ferry from Downtown San Diego, or through Imperial Beach via highway 75.
The real estate and homes for sale in Coronado are some of the most expensive properties in San Diego County. The number of homes sold in a particular year is relatively low. For example, during the period from January through July 2006, approximately 64 single-family homes sold. Approximately 79 homes sold for the same period in 2005. The price of homes in Coronado varies widely from moderately priced small cottages to multi-million dollar estates.
One method to analyze pricing trends for a particular community is to evaluate the median and average price of homes for a particular month, and compare that data against the same period last year. What follows is a comparison of the median price and average price of homes for the past seven months (January through July 2006), compared against the data for the corresponding time period in 2005.
The median price of homes represents the point at which half the homes are above a particular price point, and half the homes are below a particular price point. The average price of homes is calculated by adding up the sales price of all homes sold in a particular month, and dividing that value by the number of homes sold.
The median price of homes in July 2006 was $1,505,000, compared to $1,481,250 in July 2005, which represents a 1.6% increase. The average price of homes in July 2006 was $1,795,179, compared to $1,603,214 in July 2005, which represents an 11.5% drop. Approximately 7 homes sold in July 2006 and 14 in July 2005. In summary, the data was mixed for July 2006, with the median price posting a small increase and the average price dropping 11.5%.
The median price of homes in June 2006 was $1,775,000, compared to $1,570,000 in June 2005, which represents a 13.1% increase. The average price of homes in June 2006 was $1,998,860, compared to $1,778,214 in June 2005, which represents a 12.4% increase. Approximately 15 homes sold in June 2006 and 21 in June 2005. In summary, the data provides evidence that there was an upward price trend in June 2006 compared to the same period last year.
The median price of homes in May 2006 was $1,200,000, compared to $1,390,000 in May 2005, which represents a 13.7% drop. The average price of homes in May 2006 was $1,576,429, compared to $1,615,692 in May 2005, which represents a 2.4% drop. Approximately 7 homes sold in May 2006 and 13 in May 2005. In summary, the data provides evidence that there was a downward price trend in May 2006 compared to the same period last year.
The median price of homes in April 2006 was $2,250,000, compared to $1,450,000 in April 2005, which represents a 55.2% increase. The average price of homes in April 2006 was $2,667,200, compared to $1,731,524 in April 2005, which represents a 54% increase. Approximately 10 homes sold in April 2006 and 7 in April 2005. In summary, the data provides evidence that there was a significant upward price trend in April 2006 compared to the same period last year.
The median price of homes in March 2006 was $1,650,000, compared to $1,780,000 in March 2005, which represents a 7.3% drop. The average price of homes in March 2006 was $2,219,667, compared to $1,774,667 in March 2005, which represents a 25.1% increase. Approximately 15 homes sold in March 2006 and 9 in March 2005. In summary, the data was mixed for March 2006, with a drop in median price and an increase in average price.
The median price of homes in February 2006 was $1,185,000, compared to $875,000 in February 2005, which represents a 35.4% increase. The average price of homes in February 2006 was $1,327,000, compared to $1,011,667 in February 2005, which represents a 31.2% increase. Approximately 5 homes sold in February 2006 and 3 in February 2005. In summary, the data provides evidence that there was an upward price trend in February 2006 compared to the same period last year.
The median price of homes was $1,700,000 in January 2006, compared to $1,531,500 in January 2005, which represents an 11% increase. The average price of homes in January 2006 was $1,599,000, compared to $1,717,750 in January 2005, which represents a 6.9% drop. Approximately 5 homes sold in January 2006 and 12 in January 2005. In summary, the data was mixed for January 2006, with a jump in median price and a decline in average price.
So what does the above data tell us? Overall, there was a 19% decline in the number of homes sold during this period from 2006 to 2005. Besides that, the Coronado real estate market is very hard to characterize because of the limited number of homes that sell every month, and the wide variation in home prices. The median and average prices fluctuated substantially depending on whether or not very expensive homes sold that month or not. Prospective home buyers should seek the advise of an experienced real estate agent to help them understand the micro pricing trends of homes in their price range.
- Homes For Sale In Los Angeles County California
Studio City Homes are renowned for their excellent location in sunny Southern California. Just over the hill from Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Downtown Los Angeles, lays Studio City, ideal for living, working or relaxing. With a variety of homes, from old Spanish style homes to Modern Architecture, 70.6% of residents who reside in Studio City live in single family homes. Home prices went from a high of $848,500 between 2006 and 2007, to a decline of $637,100 in 2009. Homeowners are earnestly waiting for the housing market to resume its typical position. From April 2009 to May 2009 average sales prices of homes in Studio City went down 0.12 percent. The average estimated value went down 0.03 percent from May 2009 to April 2009. Although, the city’s average sales price and average estimated value are still above both the National average and the California State average. Studio City has an average listing price for homes for sale of $1,092,239. The current number of properties on the market is 243 with a median listing price of $894,000. The Los Angeles county average listing price for homes for sale is $898,758. The Los Angeles county total real estate listings are 26,126 and a median listing price of $446,662. No brand new Studio City Homes have been sold. California, among Florida, Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan are the top five states with the most foreclosures. Foreclosures are becoming habitual in the housing market. In the Golden State, 4.19 percent of housing has resulted in foreclosures, following Florida which is a striking 8.95 percent. Studio City is ranked 2495 out of all city foreclosure rate rankings. Foreclosure activity accounts for 39 percent. Home sales since 2005 have consistently declined. Los Angeles is ranked the number 10 city with the worst housing market in 2009. In contrast, sales are slightly rising in many mid- to high-end markets. Many homeowners are anxious for the housing market to resume its standard standpoint. You might be asking, when will the housing market get better? The amount of new and resale houses and condos sold in the state of California this past month was up by 2.9 percent since April 2009 and up 18.3 percent since May 2008. Homeowners are tossing and turning due to the lessening of their property value, increase in foreclosures and the sluggish real estate market. There is no need to worry anymore. There is always a solution to a problem, and we have your solution. There are steps which homeowners could take to present their home to a buyer in the most appealing fashion. Eliminate all odors, cleanliness should be a given, clean carpet, and brighten up the rooms by installing new lighting or opening curtains and letting the California rays shine in. Lastly, outside presentation is everything, so make sure the grass is nicely manicured and the outside paint isn’t chipping. There are many Homes for sale in Studio City; yours might be sold if you take the appropriate steps.
Yanni Raz is a mentor for many in the Real Estate Mortgage industry, Yanni Raz is been tutoring many homeowners in California and help some also to save their homes. http://www.homesinsale.com
Free WP Autoposter Plugins - Simpsonville SC Real Estate Weekly Market conditions Report Homes Sold, Homes for Sale, House Values, Properties and Listings for Sale for May 24th-30
Simpsonville SC Real Estate Weekly Market conditions Report Homes Sold, Homes for Sale, House Values, Properties and Listings for Sale for May 24th-30th 2009
There were 33 Simpsonville properties sold during the week of May 24th-30th. The median price for Simpsonville homes was $189,000. Average Days on Market(DOM) was 130 days for this period.
During this period, 5 homes in Simpsonville went under the pending or contingency contract status with a median price of $160,000.
There were 32 newly listed residential homes during this period, at a median price of $172,400. There were also 8 Simpsonville homes expired during this period.
Real Estate in Simpsonville is still very desirable as more and more people relocating to Greenville county are choosing to make Simpsonville their home. There are also several foreclosures and short sale homes available for sale for those buyers who are looking to walk in with instant equity.
Contact Me with your Simpsonville SC Real Estate Needs, and for Your Home’s Value Needs
START YOUR SIMPSONVILLE HOME SEARCH
· Victor Amadi – Your Simpsonville and Greater Greenville SC Real Estate Resource
As your Simpsonville SC and Greater Greenville residential Realtor, I am committed to staying up to date with local information, education, and technology. My intention is to be an invaluable real estate resource. So, whether you are buying or selling real estate in Simpsonville SC, Greenville SC, Greer SC, Easley SC, Mauldin SC, Fountain Inn SC, or other Upstate SC areas, I have the tools, knowledge, experience, and resources necessary to make your experience an enjoyable and successful one. Call me at 864-525-0201 so we can discuss how I can help make your next real estate transaction a success. Stats shared in this post was gathered from GGAR, it is deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
Victor Amadi is a Greenville SC Residential Real Estate Expert, who specializes in helping Home Buyers find the best possible home and get the best possible deal. He also specializes in utilizing some of the best marketing tools to help home sellers get their home sold fast and for top dollar.
Free WP Autoposter Plugins
Discussion
No comments for “Los Angeles Real Estate: Hot or Not?”